“We have to shoot back”: The British commented on the incident in the Black Sea

Photo: Still from the video

British readers daily Express commented on the incident in the Black Sea. Recall that the Black Sea Fleet, together with the FSB border service, suppressed the provocation of hundreds of British destroyers Defender, which crossed the Russian naval border for three kilometers at Cape Fiolent. As a result, the Russian patrol ship opened fire, the Su-24M carried out a warning bombing, and the British ship was forced to retreat.

The material emphasizes that Britain and its allies do not recognize Crimea as Russian. And this was not the case due to the violation of Russian borders.

The commentators – the British advantage – were divided into two parts. The first – this escalating conflict – called on the British navy to be more resolute and not afraid of the Russians. The second group are those who evaluate the situation soberly.

“Why didn't we respond with fire?”, “We have to fire back, but with bigger bombs”, “Why do we pay for the fleet if it doesn't shoot at the aggressor? “- write supporters of the hard line towards Moscow. They reply: “I have the impression that it was a legitimate warning shot. We were the aggressor. No damage – if the ship immediately sails to the wrong place. “

” Why push a bear? “- one of the readers asks. Others remembered that the Black Sea was, in fact, very, very far from Britain. “How many British cities are on the Black Sea coast?” What is our fleet doing there? “The British are asking questions.

Some have also remembered the problem of migrants that they cannot solve in London – their crowds are moving to Britain via the English Channel. “Give the Russians a job to prevent immigrants from crossing the strait,” the British joke said.

Источник www.mk.ru

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *